Solving the loss of Grealish

Aston Villa have spent brilliantly since losing Grealish. Bailey is a versatile attacker, Buendia is a fantastic link player and Ings is a constant goal threat but what hasn’t been replaced, is the influence Grealish had on midfield.

Since the 2013/14 season and the retirement of Stiliyan Petrov, Aston Villa have struggled to compete in midfield.  One season with an improving Idrissa Gueye showed promise but the French revolution Gueye was part of ended as quickly as it began, with Villa relegated and the players sold.

During that transition period, Grealish started getting minutes and his influence on the game was clear, as he increasingly covered for Villa’s midfield deficiency by slowing the play, getting fouled, forcing opposition players to get into their defensive shape and allowing Villa’s midfield to get into attacking positions through quick passing triangles.

This continued throughout his time at the club and for McGinn, Nakamba and Luiz, this has proved incredibly helpful as it allowed them to move into the final third with the confidence that defenders were moving backwards, now fearful that Grealish was going to take advantage of any gaps.
On possession turnover, the oppositions retreat also allowed the Villa defensive shape time to get back into position.

Some may argue Traore offers a similar slower style to Grealish – and he does – but it is in a direct attacking, not calculated form and this was seen during Grealish’s 2020/21 injury period, as Villa midfielders still struggled to get forward and instead, passed sideways, backwards and long; now lacking the confidence and capacity to push the opposition backwards through passing triangles.

This was also evident during the 2021/22 pre-season, as Villa sought to find wide players for crosses, rather than interplay through the middle.

New signing Buendia did example an ability to play forward passes from midfield, with some fabulous pre-season assists but they were played from deep, created through his own endeavour and in friendly matches. The Premier League is a different challenge.

Against Watford, Villa’s opener to the new season, the central midfield inadequacy was clear, with the team completely overrun and ball turnovers putting Villa defenders under immense pressure.

The turnovers were mostly down to Dean Smith’s ‘attack wide’ tactic, which skipped midfield to find wingers either straight down the line, or through cross-field passes. Crosses came in but they were poor, or the ball was lost almost immediately as players came unstuck taking on the opposition.

This ensured that attacking opposition players who would usually track back, didn’t need to and were available for the counter. This exposed the defence, particularly Matt Targett, who was chasing back to cover lost ground, rather than facing or tracking his man.

A set piece inspired win against Newcastle didn’t hide the midfield struggles, with the main tactic remained to go wide or long. Fortunately, the Magpies gave the ball away so often that Villa didn’t have the same worries as those experienced against Watford, yet they still managed three through balls to Villa’s none and even more key passes.

Defensive midfielder Luiz, who was back after winning Olympic gold, showed his typical short passing accuracy but didn’t contribute much defensively and offered little to support attacks.

Dean Smith therefore has some decisions to make. Ultimately, he needs to bite the bullet and either buy a true defensive midfielder who plays simple passes, protects the defence, and wins most fifty fifties; or he purchases midfielders who play quick triangles around the opposition, thus creating gaps and pulling their defenders out of position, or into a deeper defensive shape.

Smith doesn’t appear to have faith in the current players to either attack as a form or defence, or hold possession; otherwise Villa would play down the middle more often.

In Jacob Ramsey and Morgan Sanson, Villa may have talents who can play neat, brave football to hold the centre of the park but it would require Dean Smith to stop playing his favourites and even then, neither players are top passing talents, or defensive maestros. They, like the current starters, are all-rounders who do not excel in any capacity and one very much at the start of his career.

Aston Villa are therefore at a crossroads, and while the clubs may see this issue as ‘sneaking up on them’ most Villa fans will say it’s been coming for some time. Gueye stuck around for one year and his true defensive impact was realised at Everton, not Villa. Petrov controlled the game as Grealish did but similarly to Carrick at Manchester United, who also wasn’t a defensive player, his timing on the pitch, reading of the game and incredible passing aptitude allowed him to cover his defensive deficiencies.

Therefore, it is not since Gareth Barry that Villa had a true defensive midfielder and he wasn’t an enforcer but rather a defender who was brilliant in midfield.

Grealish is gone and his style and unique midfield influence is not coming back any time soon. Unless midfield is bolstered to recognise that and fix an endemic issue, the step up the club craves wont be happening any time soon.

An England squad chosen to play a tactic and formation is a good thing

Over the years, England managers have picked tournament squads which have divided for several reasons but what most can agree with, is few have been picked to play a tactic and formation. At Euro 2020, nobody can accuse Gareth Southgate of not doing that.

It’s important to understand how Southgate's England typically play. In the last few years, they have created chances from out wide, with central midfielders or defenders spreading passes either long or wide, across the pitch.
Forwards also get in on the act, dropping back and finding wing backs as they overlap on either side, or cutting into the box to either shoot, or find passes for shots through the middle.

Defensively, the team is compact, defending in numbers and frustrating the opposition until they can release counters at pace; often with long balls.

Formation wise, Southgate typically plays either 343 or 3421, with two wing backs who either overlap or fill in when a more attacking midfielders push on. 433 was tried against Poland but the team struggled when pressed.

England’s forwards often overload the sides, looking to support each other and allow strikers, late running midfielders, and wing backs the time to support crossed balls. In the past, this has worked, with Mason Mount excellently playing one touch football or driving with the ball to draw defenders in. However, when teams sit deep and do not commit, or are capable defenders, England have struggled.

This is where players like Grealish and Foden come in, as they offer something different, with Foden sharing some of Mounts driving qualities but having more in common with Sterling’s dribbling attributes. And Grealish, who allows strikers to set their positions in time with onrushing full backs who he plays in to cross, or, through his general crossing and passing vision.

Sterling and Rashford, if they can find some form, will offer something similar to Sancho, who will drive at pace, or expect passes to come back to him as he makes his way into the box.

This up top strategy should suit the poaching capability of Kane and Calvert Lewin but also allow them to drop back and strike sideways passes. Calvert Lewin’s height and elite heading should prove a valuable asset for someone like Grealish.

At this club, Harry Kane often drops deep to be part of play and in some England games he has done the same. Hopefully, he finds the confidence to trust his teammates and keep himself closer to the opposition box because when he's there, he's sure to find goals.

The real challenge will be getting the ball to the forwards but in Phillips, England have a quality passer who can spray balls with ease. Bellingham who looks very comfortable either taking on a player or finding one, and Rice who is an accurate ball player who rarely loses the ball, will offer something similar. The difference between all three is probably how they pass. Phillips and Rice need more space to hit their man, so wing back one-twos will be vital. Bellingham, however, is neater on the ball and looks more technically capable but much less experienced.

These midfield attributes will suit the six full/wing backs who have been taken, as not only are they all good passers in their own right, but all are natural crossers who enjoy overlapping, as good wingbacks should.
There are raised eyebrows that six full backs have been taken but James and Tripper are comfortable on the left side, Arnold can play central midfield and Walker has played central defender in a back three, as has James.

As previously mentioned, England typically attack out wide, therefore it makes sense to see a number of versatile attacking full backs included, particularly if Southgate wants to hold a lead, so may sacrifice a wide forward for a full back. The inclusion of Saka also offers a defensive or attacking solution, as the young player keeps proving capable in whatever position he plays.

Where there may be concerns is central defence as Maguire’s fitness is still to be proved; though with Stones, Coady, Mings and the potential of Walker and Rice able to fill in, the team should cope.

It is clear to see that the selected players support Southgate’s tactical set up, which is a welcomed approach; however, it will be interesting to see whether they rigidly play to a style or are encouraged to play the game as it comes. For players like Grealish and Phillips, this will be very interesting. Grealish is a useful drifter, who is capable of doing something unpredictable and Phillips passing range may be wasted if he’s expected to spray balls out wide.

There is also an unusual factor in the striking backup, as Southgate considers both Sterling and Rashford as capable replacements for Kane and Dominic Calvert-Lewin (DCL). Yet both have had difficult seasons, with Sterling struggling to recreate his sparkling form and Rashford having a very tough end to the season. Not taking Ollie Watkins may end up a major regret for the England coach, as the Aston Villa striker can mirror Kane and DCL’s style, while also offering his own.

Southgate’s selection is one of the most tactically harmonious England squads taken to any tournament. The style it plays might not be pretty and the quality of some players isn’t as high as previous generations but they stick to the tactics and formation, to do what the manager expects of them. As an England fan, is definitely something worth celebrating, even if I'm sure to spend some of my summer screaming at what many perceive as a negative, make no error set up.

The full England squad is as follows:
Goalkeepers: Dean Henderson (Man Utd), Sam Johnstone (West Brom), Jordan Pickford (Everton)

Defenders: John Stones (Man City), Luke Shaw (Man Utd), Harry Maguire (Man Utd), Trent Alexander-Arnold (Liverpool), Kyle Walker (Man City), Tyrone Mings (Aston Villa), Reece James (Chelsea), Conor Coady (Wolves), Ben Chilwell (Chelsea), Kieran Trippier (Atletico Madrid)

Midfielders: Mason Mount (Chelsea), Declan Rice (West Ham), Jordan Henderson (Liverpool), Jude Bellingham (Borussia Dortmund), Kalvin Phillips (Leeds)

Forwards: Harry Kane (Tottenham), Marcus Rashford (Man Utd), Raheem Sterling (Man City), Dominic Calvert-Lewin (Everton), Phil Foden (Man City), Jack Grealish (Aston Villa), Jadon Sancho (Borussia Dortmund), Bukayo Saka (Arsenal)

Changes are still possible until the first match, but only to replace injured players or ones testing positive for Covid-19. Goalkeepers who test positive for Covid-19 can be replaced throughout the tournament but no replaced player (all positions) can be readmitted to the squad.

Being right never felt so wrong

In one blog I questioned whether Remains project fear was toxic enough to turn people to brexit and in this one I structured concerns about 433 and Raheem Sterling. What a bitter sweet week.

Hodgson has finally gone, probably learning nothing along the way, but will England finally accept reality? Our players aren’t individually good enough and our managers tactically inept.

Watching Giaccherini play his part in a team focussed Italy reminded me why I’ve struggled to enjoy England games. We don’t care for winning tournaments.
That’s not to say the players don’t want to win it, I’m sure they do, but their application is consistently limited by the FA and their horrific choice of managers.

Despite a sturdy Euro 2016, Italians recognise there are few players coming through and the quality of Italian football has stumbled. They have as many world beaters as we do.
We also share another troubling problem, strong central players limiting our capability out wide.
Italy found a solution; they employed a manager who rated his players accurately and didn’t need a Neymar or Griezmann.

For England, the problems are obvious. Sterling is not yet good enough, either on or off the ball. Sturridge can’t play in an isolated position. Taking one defensive midfielder limited us tactically. And we had no idea how to use width, either in 433 or by playing narrow with full backs.
Defensively, and pointed out by Lee Dixon against Iceland, the detailing/application was inefficient.
Hodgson really is to blame for this one. And Conte should be admired.

Initially happy enough with the England team I hoped Roy would play narrow and put to bed the myth that selfish central players play wide naturally. But no, our obsession with 433 resulted in a flat approach in attack with a hugely inefficient formation.
Italy’s second goal against Spain is a shining example of what England need. We may want great players doing great things but those times are at the moment behind us. There are no Scholes, Beckham’s, Shearer’s, Gazza’s etc who make a good team stronger. Therefore first and foremost we need a team.

Individually, England aren’t good enough and neither are Italy. But why is Giaccherini in a quarter final, whereas Townsend and title winning Albrighton, Drinkwater stuck at home?
The answer is management, from both the FA and Hodgson.
Would Marc Albrighton get a friendly if he was worth £20million+ with 1.3 million twitter followers? What about Noble?

Why are we still shunning tactics for favourites? I think it’s time we accepted the fans vision of success is very different from the FA’s.

The next England manager must be someone who considers Albrighton an option, who recognises the value of Drinkwater next to Dier and who isn’t concerned about dropping a player without the mental capacity for his tactic. Sometimes the star isn’t a star performer.

They don’t need to be English; they just need to know how to win and why their tactic works.
And we England fans deserve it.

Roy, just play the best players

I was happy enough with England's performance against Russia but I only thought we looked right after Dier scored the opener. I finally saw a use for Sterling.

Lallana did exactly what a forward should do in 433. Pass early, keep the ball moving at your feet unless there's an overlap, draw defenders to create space, try one two's and make sure the pace of play is purposeful. He may not be a star but he played his part and allowed Walker and Kane to stick to useful positions.

Sterling however slowed the play, allowed defenders to settle, waited for tackles, and caused players to recheck runs/come for the pass. I'll keep the head shaking to a minimum.

When I compare other nations players I'm absolutely baffled why someone like Townsend or Albrighton were not embraced as tactical weapons. Euro 2016 will be won and lost though concentration. Either a defender giving himself a moment to rest or an attacker who doesn't take a chance. You need aware players who create chances, good or bad.

However there's no opportunity for change, and I'm not all that disappointed. Though Roy can gain balance, even if it's only playing to the teams natural abilities. 

Therefore I don't think 433 is a tactic England can rely upon. We must play narrow and use our full-backs. We may lack some natural technicians but we have intelligent energetic team players, which frustratingly need some time to bed.
Kane next to Sterling and Lallana forced a false 9 approach, but England need a striker up at all times because Rooney doesn't score from distance any more. Similarly Walker and Rose need two strikers to aim at because they're not precision crosser's.

The balance is still wrong and it will require the best players to play. Milner for example had to start against Russia because Kane would've spent more time on the front foot.
With two tough games to go and the Welsh only needing a draw we need to pray that Sterling's other use is making a Championship player feel inadequate. 

My current Euro 2016 England Squad

Watching England beat Germany reminded me why I love International football; great managers.

International football is as much about the manager as the player, not just for players picked but for tactics employed.

In both these departments England have struggled, which due to a dearth of top talent over the last decade should be a major concern. Sometimes I blame the players, the Lampard/Gerrard debate is a perfect example, but on many occasions I lose my passion for International tournaments the moment the England squad is announced. I, you, we all know what England we're getting.

However, watching England in the second half against Germany, made me look at Hodgson in a different light, had he achieved a tactical shape and balance befitting of an International team?

As Vardy netted it was clear a tactical understanding was on show. With no natural width it was down to strikers moving defenders, midfielder's holding possession and full backs to run into space.

Qualities the goal creating players have a natural fondness for. Clyne makes runs and crosses, Barkley looks to change the direction of play past the centre circle and Vardy is always on the move, especially in the box.

For the first time in many years I'm genuinely excited about England's balance, but I wonder, is this Roy's doing, or circumstance?

The following is a list of players I feel fit the balance of play, players who in my mind should go to the Euros.

Goalkeepers

Hart - Overrated but still highly rated.

Butland - Great season, deserves a chance.

Forster - Every team needs a huge keeper.

Central defence

Smalling - Wanders, can be headless but is the most consistent defender we have. Having a good year and appears more comfortable leading at the back.

Cahill - Not having a good year but we're not blessed at the back and he does have ability, suspect positioning.

Stones - When he adopts a more composed attitude in the box he'll be a real asset. That's up to him. Many ball hungry defenders started off making mistakes, the best ironed them out.

Full backs

Rose - Having a great year and while he isn't the best defensively, both in the tackle and position wise he will works well with Alli, Dier and Kane; that's invaluable.

Clyne - Same as Rose but perhaps a little more composed and weathered.

Walker - Exactly the same as Rose. Best of an average bunch but with more pace than the average gazelle.

Seeing as England do not have wide crossing players, or are unwilling to select them we need energetic full backs to support in positions down down the line. Without that tactic the opposition will be able to settle into defensive positions.

Midfield

Dier - Solid, knows to cover the positions of Rose and Alli. Can play centre back or in either full back position. Growing in confidence too; great to have a defensive midfielder.

Alli - Proper box to box midfielder, can pass, shoot, dribble and more importantly select the right option or not dwell on a decision. Will make mistakes but also create chances.

Barkley - He can play a more midfield based role but is better pushed a little higher as he always wants to be involved. A perfect option when you have full backs bombing on or attackers making runs. Advanced role looks to be Rooney's so it'll be interesting to see how Roy chooses to use him.

Milner - No Milner, no party. I think the time is running out on this legend but he's still solid in every position and makes good decisions. An invaluable trait in the final minutes of games and ones where others are losing their heads.

Attack

Kane - A proper centre forward who makes/finishes his own chances and understands the value of team play. A massively valuable asset for England because his game is versatile by nature.

Vardy - You're told your new club striker is lightning quick, loves scoring, makes countless runs, gives 100% and is humble. What't not to love. Tactically a perfect foil for Kane.

Rooney - If fit he has to go despite not being the Rooney of old. He will finally play in his favoured position with strikers ahead who love to be busy and not overtly selfish. Rooney with time? Yes please. Years of this man wasted out wide with an opportunity to prove himself in the middle. A brilliant passer and creator who is still a great player. The pressure would be off him this tournament; he has a part to play (one last time) and that shouldn't be overlooked.

Welbeck - An enthusiastic player with speckles of quality. Not my favourite but in tight games you need a goal scorer and he loves international football. Admittedly he scores freely against minnows but also gets winners against all-comers at every level. Crouch was wasted when we needed something different, Welbeck probably shouldn't be.

These are my certainties, players who would naturally complement each other and allow us to hold the ball centrally.

My attacking worry has always been out wide, Walcott and Sterling can outpace every defender but both lack the quality and character to play as wingers, they are forwards. The same for Chamberlain.

If you choose to play a 433 with forwards you allow the opposition defenders to settle because attacking players naturally cut back inside; for example the first half against Germany.

Sturridge offers the same problem and to an extent so does Lallana. There is only one English player who fits width as a tactic, Albrighton. He creates danger from his position as left winger but as right winger he's very effective in creating chances, he is of course right footed.

He will never be picked so we must accept that the middle is where we will be most effective and not expect miracles when we play with wide forwards. Roy must recognise this too.

At least this time it'll be Kane and not Sturridge as the lone striker. He'll demand crosses and is very able to play with his back to goal on both feet.

The rest who should probably go

Henderson - Rated highly by Roy but alas not by me. A good player who makes decent decisions and gets up and down the pitch but really isn't superb at anything. Does have a nice pass when he is afforded time and reads attacking play well.

Carrick - Losing Scholes meant we lost a player who passes calmly under pressure, Carrick has proved a decent understudy. We may need that cool head in central midfield, if his knees hold.

Drinkwater - It may be foolish to go to the Euros with one defensive midfielder and Drinkwater has the discipline to play that position as well as be involved slightly higher up. Deserves his opportunity.

Sterling - A sub if ever I've seen one. Poor crosser, average passer, average finisher. He may be a stunning dribbler and incredibly quick but he's got a long way to go to prove himself as a guaranteed England starter. Will decimate a slow defence so will rightly play his part in the tournament.

Baines/Bertrand - We may need another full back, despite Dier being an option. Quality vs. endeavour, Bertrand is fit and has been playing. I'd take Simpson.

Sturridge -  A problem because he's ineffective out wide despite being a chance maker, for himself. Poor passer, too one footed and selfish to play up top alone so he must play with a partner. Sometimes the young talents are eclipsed by the Vardy's of this world, is it time England accepted that?

Lallana - Klopp has brought him back to his best and we're now seeing the confident talent of two years ago. Smart enough to play in the hole, technically gifted enough to wander and keep the ball moving and with enough crossing ability to play wide. Not a bad time to hit form despite not yet meeting the hype.

Honourable mentions (players I would consider until the last minute) -

Noble - A solid player in central midfield who makes great decisions. Great passer, solid striker of a ball, good tackler, very committed. A real shame he hasn't had an opportunity to show why team play is invaluable.

Albrighton - Puffs at 60 minutes but sprints for 70. His mantra is cover in defence and take the ball with you/cross to keep play moving. Predominantly right footed but much better than David Bentley, who got 8 caps when England still had Beckham. Would add something that Kane needs and Vardy experiences.

We choose many one-dimensional forwards, why not choose at least one one-dimensional winger.

Walcott - I still can't get on board with Walcott. He has talent but he's lost so much rawness since joining Arsenal. Poor crosser but intelligent enough to get into the right position, decent finisher but poor decision maker, does cause havoc in the box.

Chamberlain - Better crosser than Walcott but spent his time as an impact performer who is struggling to refine his rawness. Offers more than Walcott out wide but both are subs.

Wilshere - Permanently injured and perhaps not worth the risk. Needs time to recuperate and should be given that. When fit he's definitely a player you want because he links up play brilliantly and is committed to his team.

Luke Shaw - Same as Wilshere, he is constantly rushed back and constantly injured. We cannot afford a wasted space or an unfit player.

Defoe - Still doing what he always does, scores when he starts but quiet for most of the match.

Simpson - Top of the league, resilient and hard working. Gone through the mill and has come out stronger. With so little in terms of defensive quality perhaps taking him as a sub would prove valuable in respect of the Leicester bond.

Jagielka - Everton ship goals but yet he remains and option. England's choices are not that strong and pedigree keeps him involved.

Jose Fonte - Solid, dependable, experienced. Deserves a mention despite his age.

Callum Chambers - He plays for Arsenal so automatically in Roy's mind. A good young player who has been blighted with injury and perhaps poor choices. Moving to Arsenal has not brought him on enough despite showing glimses of ability. I'd prefer a solid defender like Fonte than a young talented one.

Aston Villa, the Championship beckons

No posts in an age, mostly because Aston Villa haven't bothered to play any football but things have been interesting (if you're not a Villa fan), culminating in a disgraceful 2-0 loss to Hull City.

Paul Lambert would clearly make a great Director of Football, his signings have been brilliant and the prices have been very fair but management is not something that this manager excels in.
Looking at his mistakes this year it's clear to see that he is as clueless about remaining tactically astute as he is about player management.

Certain examples point to Villa's problems and none more so than player selection, when McLeish let go of Guzan Villa fans rejoiced when Lambert signed him up again, and we were right, he has saved Lambert's behind on a number of occasions.
An incredibly low goal total has been followed by a lack of attacking ability and player selection has played its part, Lambert is treading a thin line.

Performances have been as bizarre as player selection with Lambert choosing under performers to almost every option. In contrast to other teams fortunes Villas own youth players have been given no support to steady a sinking ship and stagnant stars are given countless opportunities to fail.
On one hand you could argue that the players have failed the manager but in the case of Agbonlahor any ability to have an impact has dried up and Benteke's movement, or lack of it points to either a lack of belief in the managers tactics or no desire to play, I would suggest the former.

Any manager who has seen a football match, let alone one who escaped the Championship, understands that players need to follow the pass, move to create space or make supportive runs but time after time Aston Villa players have been allowed to perform in their sideways style looking for five aside passes to motionless players, when Alan Hutton is your most creative player you know you have problems.
These are managerial failures, the manager should either drop players who aren't doing what they're told or change what they are doing because the current idea train is failing.
The same failures have come with Grealish who never gets a game, Robinson who was brought back from a successful loan only to stagnate, Bent who is now scoring in the Championship and countless others who have either been given their shot for an extended period of failure or ignored outright in favour of Lambert's guys.

Clearly Lambert's tactics are flawed, the loss of Bent and Albrighton point to this, one likes to finish inside the box and the other likes to put the ball into the box, while neither will set the Premiership alight they will get you chances and get you goals, two things that don't occur at Villa park or away from it. We do however see many passes outside the box, neat interplay when defenders are in defensive positions and a complete lack of movement inside the box. Villa's woes have suffered from a lack of variation and a lack of ambition, passes are never with purpose and the perfect pass is always a consideration, a classic example was the recent fixture with Hull where the ball in the box created real chances and thus two goals, but only with 5 minutes to go a Westwood shot delivered a great chance for Benteke.
The manager must appreciate variation and needs to learn, quickly, or Aston Villa will be relegated, at least he has pedigree at getting back into the Premiership, he'll need it!.

Edit -

Gone, gone, gone, gone, gone! The Lambert nightmare is over, now if we can just get someone with a football brain into the club we might start to go in the right direction, I'll take two places higher than we are if that's all we can get!

Chesterfield 3 - 1 Aston Villa (player review)

Aston Villa ran out with their youth team in full flight but it was the three older outfield players who really struggled to match Chesterfields excellent determination and teamwork. With a slow start from the Villa Chesterfield showed they're a team brimming with confidence as they dominated the first half, especially the opening 20 minutes of the game. The first Chesterfield goal by Darikwa was taken well but it was a mistake from a Villa defender and the lack of positioning which really told.

The three wiser heads on the pitch, Bennett, Lowton and Tonev clearly struggled to match Chesterfields determination and none of them really impressed. Tonev looked purposeful but struggled to either make or take chances, Lowton didn't struggle as such but some poor passing, slow reactions and wing back defending didn't make up for his ability to link with Gardner as the first half progressed, and Joe Bennett showed that even League 1 could be a struggle as he was constantly caught out of position and lacked any sort of bite in the challenge. Clearly targeted in the game Bennett showed Villa fans that a struggling season could be on the horizon and that the flying winger Richardson really has to play, despite his own defensive inadequacies. 

Despite the first 20 minutes of Chesterfield domination there was most certainly some positives in the next 25. The return of Gardner after a battle with injuries was great to see and the young central midfielder showed he hadn't lost his ability to spot a pass and switch the play, even if some of his passes were floated and not hit with purpose, his touch was decent and he managed to build a decent partnership with any player who was able to play one touch football but mistakes were made and he looks like a player returning from injuries rather than one with a new lease of life. The same could be said of Johnson who was extremely neat on the ball, happy to pass through the middle of the opposition and extremely useful getting up and down the pitch. Johnson built good partnerships with his teammates and although some passes went awry he showed he has the character and determination to be part of both defensive and attacking needs, his energy was a huge part of his good play but he's clearly trying to impress, sometimes to his teams detriment.

There were some eye catching performances from a youth perspective and Robinson looked lively and determined to show he had a good first touch and desire to go forward with or without the ball. Chesterfield were excellent at stopping him attack but it was clear that he wanted to push the defence backward and with Burke next to him they looked like players who are improving rather than stagnating. Burke especially was part of many good moves and his determination and strength allowed other players the opportunity to take better forward positions and build attacks. Though few and far between any chances created were due to Burke's good work and he should be proud of his ability to disrupt the oppositions defence. 

The second half saw a raft of changes but two players who started in the first were strong throughout, Donacien and Carruthers. Donacien started poorly and was at fault for Darikwa's goal but as the game progressed the young defender grew in confidence and started to show that he has the ability to make tackles, win headers and spot an interception. The central defender is blessed with excellent pace and this was of huge benefit both on and off the ball allowing him to either dribble out of defence or cover mistakes made by the likes of Bennett, Gardner or Johnson. Central defence is a very tough position but the youngster showed great signs of building on the minutes he's been given and is a definite option instead of Clarke and Baker when we need to dig for young replacements. 

Similarly Carruthers started poorly, with a few squeezed passes intercepted by a busy Chesterfield defence but the naturally offensive player showed real signs of class missing from previous Villa teams and deserved to play the whole game. He created many opportunities for attackers to move forward, his passing became creative and although he didn't make many chances for himself the Villa team would've looked flat and uninspiring without him. In his previous game the midfielder played as a holding midfielder and it really didn't suit him but as he pushed forward Villa did too and tactically the more advanced position helped the team look dangerous.

The second half also saw Grealish and N'Zogbia come on and the impact was immediate, N'Zogbia ran with the ball well, worked well with his team and constantly pushed the Chesterfield players out of position. The usually selfish player had a part to play in Villa's only goal and while one on one with the keeper he squared to Grealish who nipped ahead of the defence and slotted the ball into the net. Energy levels were much improved in the second half and Villa's trio of N'Zogbia, Grealish and Carruthers showed that together they could link up to good effect. Sadly tactical ineptitude reared it's head throughout the game and two goals were conceded from set pieces with a visibly frustrated Guzan confused at how stationary his defence could be. 

The positives were clear to see and although Chesterfield could have scored a few more the game was a good work out for the younger Villa players and the impact of the better players would have made Lambert a happy man. Huge problems remain, sadly Bennett was back to his worst and on set pieces nothing has improved but some of the Villa youth got important minutes and the confidence to play for the club.

An honourable mention for Herd who is back, lets hope in the long term as we need a central midfielder with bite (though he did play centre back in this game), and Okore, Herd's replacement in defence who looked a little rusty but confident on the ball and unfazed by any previous injuries.

Well done to Chesterfield who played good purposeful football and made Villa's trip a fight or get trampled affair.

Hopefully the future is bright but it will still require a lot of tactical consideration from the manager and personal development from the player, though only a friendly most Villains can count themselves lucky that Guzan is still a Villa player as once again he could be the difference between survival and relegation. 

The two halves of Lambert; the trouble with Villa

Paul Lambert is a manager in which I place great trust, he has a passion for tactics, shown by the variety Aston Villa have utilised, a desire to play passing football and a quality emphasis on trusting his players. He has developed over the last year and improved on player selection, tactics for players and changing things when the team isn't playing well but while all these positive occur they also exist as real negatives that could be adding to the struggles.

Instead of delivering countless match reports I wanted to deconstruct where I feel the manager needs to develop and why.

Player selection and trust
On the whole Lambert has come on a lot in this respect, below are some examples of successes and good decisions that have improved the side.
Last year Joe Bennet probably experienced the hardest part of his career so far, a huge amount of trust was placed in the young left sided player yet he delivered very little in the role Lambert gave him as left back. His defending was woeful, positioning very poor but attacking play showed promise. Lambert received a lot of criticism and finally when the year began we saw him dropped from the team.
Ashley Westwood also found some criticism but due to excellent passing, some Petrov like reading of the game, and a desire to put his mistakes behind him Lamberts trust was rewarded and he has become a key player this year.
Clark who saw favour at the start of Lambert reign has been replaced by the decisive, passionate Baker, and Luna who we hoped would solve the left back crisis was quickly replaced by the quality Bertrand.
Fabian Delph was considered a Championship player but trust and individual development has placed him as one of the first names on the team sheet and a quality member of the Villa squad.
These players have shown where Lambert has balanced trust with quality and has made important decisions to replace the less quality options, such as bringing in Luna and Bertrand as left backs but has Lambert also caused himself some headaches by ignoring fringe players that perhaps he hasn't placed as much trust in?

Two of these fringe players are Samir Carruthers and Marc Albrighton, while the later has found himself injured Carruthers has seen his Villa career stifled hugely and is finally getting some quality games while on loan. When he has played for the club he has filled a role Lambert wanted, a number 10. He plays behind the striker, takes on his man and has some good passing going forward, a role that doesn't suit any other player at the club. This role is imperative to breaking down stubborn defences and allows a new tactical approach to winning games yet we have not seen it utilised in any manner during Lamberts tenure. This is not to say Carruthers has the quality to make this role his permanant home but it's clearly a role he can play, something Bennett cannot as left back.

This fact brings us nicely to Marc Albrighton, the only wide player at the club. Though he perhaps lacks the quality to be a top winger he has the best cross at the club, a desire to help out all over the pitch, natural width and a passion to make run for through balls, qualities which endear him to fans and players alike. He however has seen his game time cut short mostly because of Lamberts desire for short passing tactics.
These two players can still improve but need games and a managers plan B, Lambert has either not considered how they could work or doesn't trust their qualities to deliver chances. I would chance at a combination of both but lead toward the latter as being the main reason.
Against West Ham Albrighton changed the game, the wide approach completely threw their defence and while we didn't score we did threaten, a lot, it seemed to take the team 15 minutes to realise that these crosses were actually real chances, by then the game was mostly over. This change of tactics were not down to manager tactics but down to player attributes, if only Lambert realised he also needed someone to poach a second ball/rebound. Weimann perhaps?
Weimann is an interesting player, trusted by the manager he is filling a role rather than playing to his strengths and it has shown as his few chances a game are usually spurned  rather than taken, if he was playing as a striker instead of a hardworking wide forward perhaps we'd finish the chances the creative Benteke carves out. Though a good player Agbonlaor isn't a poacher and he doesn't read the game like the little Austrian Weimann.
We have lacked a combination of player trust and tactical naturalness and this takes me nicely onto tactics.

Tactics
Lamberts 352 and 532 got us in a lot of trouble last year, he tried to fit a team to a tactic rather than a tactic to a team and over and over it caused us issues, as soon as we moved to 4 at the back some calmness came but certain players still underperformed. This year we have seen Lambert show real strength in this respect and we have seen a balance of good tactics against the right teams, however the balance of tactical personnel is still lacking. As mentioned the omission of Albrighton and Carruthers show Lambert hasn't considered width and a link man and player wise Lambert is struggling to find a quality balance, over and over this season certain decisions have confused the fans as well as lowering confidence within the team.

This weekend Newcastle scored a winner in the last minutes of the game and two players contributed hugely to our downfall. When Westwood came off we lost the only quality passer in the team with Sylla his replacement; though Sylla didn't do a lot wrong he also didn't add much to our play, didn't play box to box, or higher up and gave the ball away through poor crossing. This changed the way we attacked with no compensation in a tactical sense, the calmer passing dried up with Delph left doing the defensive and creative midfield work. For the next 10 minutes we looked impotent going forward but still had some counter luck on the right as Newcastle pushed forward, then in the final 10 minutes Lambert made his second error of the day and this was bringing on Joe Bennett as left back. In the weeks previous Bennett worked well as a left wing back and wide man but the problems he faced while defending came back to haunt us. Remy's goal was poor defending all round but Bennett was the real problem, his awful defensive header gave the ball back to the Magpies and they duly make their chance count. As soon as he came on, with Sylla on the same side, Newcastle attacked our left and we saw Villa's defenders looking nervously in order to cover potential defensive frailties; suddenly our defensive confidence was decreased and Newcastle drifted forward with ease.

But did Lambert have immediate options? Tactically perhaps not, the club has no depth in midfield; Gardner and Carruthers are out on loan, Johnson has not seen the bench in some time and there really isn't anybody else to mention. As far as left backs go perhaps Bertrand was injured but if not Lambert went for the win from left back and ignored both Albrighton and Tonev as attacking options. Tonev is really struggling but he doesn't lack confidence and has a lot of pace going forward and Albrighton who plays on the right could have exploited the passes Agbonlahor wasted. Even Bennett as left winger could have worked but instead we stuck with our impotent setup.
He could have gone to a natural 442 and pushed for a win with a solid back line, instead he gambled on a tactic that wasn't working and favouring plan A with plan A players.
Many of our poor performances and losses can be attributed to plan A, as well as a last resort desire to find Benteke with a long ball.

Lambert is a developing manager but he needs to understand what he has and where he can influence outcomes, if this means eating some humble pie by bringing players back into the team then he should do it, it makes him more flexible and more in tune with his players. He needs to place trust in all his players and not the ones he has brought in/nurtured and strike the balance between tactics and quality.
We all know he wants to pass to win, and I support that passion (even though at times we've had appalling pass completion statistics), but he needs attacking personnel plan B's and not just tactical ones.

The relegation zone is not too far away and so experiments will most likely not occur but perhaps the week in Portugal was as important for the manager as it was the squad; we can only hope.

Arsenal 1 - 3 Aston Villa (17/08/13)

An opening day fixture in which Arsenal were strong favourites ended up exposing Wenger’s tactical fragility; as an ever attacking Arsenal were left frustrated by some great goalkeeping from Guzan and desperate defending from the Villa back line, the Claret and Blues, today Claret and White, made their chances count, with a small hand from referee Anthony Taylor.

The first half started as last season ended, Villa fragile at the back and lacking a controlling midfield presence, and Arsenal attacking freely and looking like they could score at every opportunity. After 5 minutes Oxlade-Chamberlain was clearly ready to play as he used his pace and Arsenals incisive passing to stretch his full back and feed in Giroud with a simple cross. That’s right, I said Arsenal cross. 1-0 Arsenal. In fact the Gunners crossed a good amount for a Wenger team, sadly Jenkinson, who came on for Gibbs (cut above the eye) was the main exponent of this and he wasn’t particularly productive.

The first half continued that way with Arsenal creating good space in wide areas and Rosicky pulling the strings in the middle, yet for all of Arsenals good chances and neat play it was the pace of Agbonlahor that caused the most danger. A lovely move left the striker free to play kick and run through the middle and Arsenal only had one option to stop this advancement. A blatant foul in the box by Szczesny almost worked as the resulting penalty, taken by Benteke, was saved by the keeper. However the striker is a goal scorer and the nicely presented rebound was nodded in with ease.
Villa looked sharper for the rest of the half but Arsenal were clearly the better team and Villa simply couldn’t cope with their play.

1-1 at the break, Arsenal fans would feel rightly aggrieved.

The second half started similarly to the first with Villa floundering to keep control of Arsenal’s neat play style, however their passing looked crisper and on the hour Agbonlahor stripped the ball from the dwelling Cazorla, darted through the middle and was brought down by a desperate tackle from Koscielny. Sadly for Arsenal it seemed a good tackle, but the referee had a blocked view and Koscielny was punished with a yellow and a penalty. This time Benteke shaped for the top corner but swept the ball to the other side. 2-1 Villa.

From that moment Arsenal were stretched, their counter attacking game couldn’t work in the same manner and instead of soaking up pressure and breaking quickly they lost control of the midfield and needed to move up in clusters of passing. This suited Villa perfectly who with Agbonlahor’s desire to get back, and midfielders closing easy balls nullified the one touch passing.
Rosicky still looked dangerous and had a fantastic chance to level, he’d missed 2 easy chances before, but Guzan rushed out to make a great save; a few minutes later this was followed by another great save that saw Cazorla’s shot tipped onto the bar; this was the last Arsenal really tested the Villa defence.

Sadly for Arsenal things got worse as Koscielny’s yellow was doubled for a red and the Gunners high line allowed a great ball from Weimann to find Luna; one on one from the half way line the Spaniard entered the box, shaped for a return pass and slotted past a stranded Szczesny.
It was quite a celebration for the man nicknamed Tony Moon.

Sadly for Arsenal it felt like little had changed over the summer, dangerous play but nobody taking control at the right times, Wilshere played well and passed nicely but was moaning as much as the Arsenal fan’s instead of getting on with the game, Rosicky looked genuinely brilliant and was unfortunate to not score, but Walcott looked above his level again and Cazorla is clearly still in a pre-season mindset. Sagna got injured late on which has to be a real worry but Arsenal need a Suarez, or someone with his arrogance/ambition. It could be another season of ‘close but not cigar’ for the Gunners, though I’m sure not many teams would be disappointed finishing 4th.

Villa however might have a sneaky eye on Europe, two things could occur this season and for the Villains the manager is key; Delph looks a great midfield disruptor, Agbonlahor looks back to his hungriest, Lowton and Guzan continued their good form, Spurs will regret not buying Benteke, Weimann was the usual outlet and even Clark seemed ready for the long year ahead.

Where Lambert got it right today was the inclusion of El Ahmadi who sat back well, picked out good passes and made a nuisance of himself in defence without needing to look like a defensive player. His passing was clearly a threat and this allowed Villa’s counter attacking style to strangle Arsenal’s advances. With such a young squad, Westwood a Lambert favourite, and Sylla as an option tactical squad rotation in central midfield may prove the catalyst for Villa’s success, or their frustration.

3 points deserved for the Villains, Arsenal simply didn’t look hungry enough; though I am sure a certain Thunderbird will heap blame on a man in black.

Oh, a small mention for GDS (Goal Decision System) when Delph’s shot from distance rattled off the post and rebounded across the goal; for a tester it did indeed work and TV replays were quick to agree.

Aston Villa; manager, club or players? Some faults analysed.

The last three months have been a real roller-coaster at Villa park and the fans have shown an unfortunate amount of accuracy in judging their team and manager.

This accuracy would mostly concentrate on the lack of squad depth and poor use of tactics from our attacking manager.

With four days left in the transfer window the worries are really surfacing as a fragile Villa team has added nothing to their armoury.

Quality has been a real issue, and a lack of leaders is destroying confidence minute by minute; the return of Vlaar inspired a confident first half performance against West Brom but the slightest opposition attack has most Villa defenders sprawling.

The question of quality is problematic, a young team plays an awkward tactic and even though 352 could really suit their abilities pieces of the puzzle are missing.

An experienced left back leaving the club hopefully points to a plan of action relating to midfield, Delph and Bannan are a very poor partnership as both are mop up players but in different parts of the pitch; and neither have real physical presence. Delph has shown real maturity in recent weeks but he needs a partner to protect him, a true tackling midfielder who takes on a man with his physical presence rather than technical ability, the same could be said for Bannan.

The loss of Petrov really highlights this, while not the strongest player his on the ball positioning and calm attitude allowed the team time to assess their own tactical presence and though he played a slow game he took pressure off struggling players. A potential alternative could be Herd but a lack of defenders has pushed him into the back 3.

Injuries have devastated the team yet the reliance on poor performers is keeping confidence low, with Agbonlahor back, Dunne on his way and Nzogbia looking fit there must be something to get excited about; yet this excitement has nothing to do with Lambert efforts throughout the season where his young signings have really struggled to pay back unwavering managerial support.

This support hasn’t found its way to our own academy and far from setting a challenge it is simply decreasing the potential of them succeeding; for the many fans who were watching MacDonalds academy team thrive in previous seasons their absence seems to point to a manager doing it his way, rather than a manager who galvanizes, perhaps Weimann’s absence at the start of the season and instance of playing wide might point to this.

After Carruthers spirited performance in the last few minutes against Liverpool fans probably expected to see him getting some more game time yet in recent weeks the non playing ‘take on your man’ midfielder has been dropped from the squad entirely.

A rare glimpse of first team action for Daniel Johnson stopped as soon as it started, striker Jordan Bowery has been supporting from the wings in dying minutes and Derrick Williams was publicly told he wasn’t ready after 10 minutes of game time.

Enda Stevens has latterly found game time but has struggled with fitness, as has Lichaj; yet whenever called upon both have shown dedication to survival and added to the team’s unity.

Many fans would be questioning whether Bennett is ready? Whether Lowton really supports our defence? Why money was spent on Bowery when Delfourneso was sent on loan? And why El Ahmadi was bought when he offers no defensive quality? Poor performances from Bannan and Delph have seen them retain places, and Holman is a grafter rather than the link man the manager hopes for.

Player relations are imperative and there are examples of ex Villa players that left due to a lack of first team football, I’m sure many fans would be over the moon if the squad still included Crouch, Cahill and Gardner, and perhaps not too upset if it included Ridgewell, Lowry, Hogg and Whittingham.

Paul Pogba has proven that even the big teams can let useful players go; and I am reminded of a certain Samir Carruthers who came to Villa from Arsenal.

Player management aside tactics haven’t played to players strengths, a defensive crisis is compounded by Collins and Cuellars departure and the board seems to lack a director who understands the wider nature of success in football. Lambert is in a difficult position but he has been charged with this responsibility, he missed a huge chance to reduce first team pressure during the FA cup tie with Milwall yet a strong side exampled their fragility to Tuesdays opponents Newcastle.

Lambert needs to be strong; he was strong enough to buy young, part company with MacDonald, set strict team rules and gamble on a young Belgian but he hasn’t show enough strength to look at his own flaws and change his own managerial methods.

With enough games to save themselves extra numbers could really bolster the Villains campaign, but if not forthcoming the only way the club will stay amongst the elite is if their young talented manager changes his approach and plays to strengths and not beliefs.

Aston Villa 1 – 0 Reading (27/11/2012)

A deserved win for the Midlanders in an anxious match

Reading never looked like taking control but neither did the Claret and Blues; Aston Villa seemed comfortable in midfield but in the final third flooding Reading defenders made them look very ordinary, on the flip side Reading looked dangerous on the break and made their way into Villa’s final third with ease but lacked somebody who was willing to take control of the second phase.

Team balance was a problem for both teams, Roberts constantly pushed the Villa defence back but lacked a partner or midfielder to support him, while Villa’s Agbonlahor and Benteke found their best fortune going it alone.

Reading’s midfield were anonymous as a team, Robson-Kanu did pull the Villa defence around and Leigertwood closed down the dangerous plays with ease but their fragility was exposed while defending set pieces from a dangerous Bannan. Bannan showed glimpses of brilliance but offered a swagger of over confidence which was only quietened when Ireland stepped onto the pitch, fitting then that it was Westwood’s corner from which Benteke headed in the winner, the first right footed corner Villa had tried. This 80^th minute goal was deserved, but looked unlikely.

The link between midfield and attack had been Bannan but he wasted many opportunities to play through the defence and sought to play the more difficult ball when he could, the same could not be said for Reading who on the day lacked any real ball players and struggled to find space.

Reading looked stale in attack but their defence looked dedicated, aided in part by their midfield. They didn’t really look tested on the ground and did a good job at closing the middle or forcing players out wide, unfortunately deep midfielders allowed Villa full backs to push high and their defenders to come up for set pieces. Clarke perhaps had more action in attack than he did defending.

Villa had a paper thin defence for this game and the injury of Stevens was a real blow, fortunately injury prone Baker continued after his knock and Lichaj filled in for Stevens with admirable quality. Lowton was a particular performer on the day and this caused Reading to stick to defensive positions, thus slowing their support, but the lack of experience still showed and players such as Clark, Lowton, Lichaj and Baker will need to remain mentally strong in the next few months.

Reading had real issues connecting up phases of play and squad depth isn’t going to assist them, Pogrebnyak who remained seated would’ve caused Villa problems, though an excellent Guzan would probably disagree, but little more graces their bench. The exciting McLeary had a few minutes but was dealt with easily by the impressive Lowton and this must be a concern for the Royals. Reading need a bit of a miracle before Christmas, as well as Guthrie, but with very difficult games ahead it could be a January transfer window that makes or breaks their season.

The same can be said for Villa, play and players are gelling but points are difficult to come by and wins even rarer; they deserved the 3 points against Reading but only managed it thanks to a LeFondre gift of a miss; something needs to develop and a player capable of taking control of the game and ball needs to be added.

West Ham 1 - 0 Aston Villa - 18/08/2012 - Drab, but not bad.

West Ham 1 - 0 Aston Villa - (18/08/2012)

A match with spurts of quality (not from Villa) fizzled out into drabness with West Ham the happier.

The first 20 minutes gave no clue to the rest of the game, Aston Villa passed well, drew West Ham out and ignored the physical capability of West Ham's outfit.
Yet 4 minutes later West Ham clearly felt Villa's passing game would not take them into the final third and they pushed up accordingly.
Long balls to the effective Cole allowed Nolan to be a nuisance and Villa never worked out how to crack their shape. As soon as Diame found his feet the midfield was closed leaving Villa out of ideas.
Set pieces had West Ham invigorated and on the 40th minute a flick on ending up dropping to Nolan who wasn't wasting his opening day gift.

To be honest there wasn't much to toast from a Villa perspective; they looked stifled and lacked a plan B, they used the long ball a little more in the second half, and big hearts helped them get up the pitch but there was no real consistent working of a plan.
Ireland was involved and look lively, El Ahmadi was insightful but always on the back foot and N'Zogbia spent much of the game allowing West Ham to get back in defence. Changes to the line-up did little to stimulate the Villains, Gardner had a horrible 15 minutes, Bannan tried but had no runners and Weimann, like Bent in the first half had nothing to feed off.
The passing was fine, the attitude was excellent but without wingers, or players who take on their defenders the staleness were evident.
Albrighton and Agbonlahor were real misses, both create space and drag defenders and this should be a thought for the future, perhaps Carruthers future.

West Ham were well drilled, strong on the ball and played decent football, they closed the game and the fans were even treated to a goal line clearance from Nathan Baker when Maiga rounded Given.
Vaz Te was a constant thorn and constantly worked the Villa defence, even Demel felt his position as defender was safe and made the right wing his own.
Whether this ploy will work all season is a question for 37 games time but West Ham start with 3 points and a good blend of characters. Nolan, Noble and Diame certainly make up for any defensive concerns.

James Collins left with a smile on his face, with his opposite numbers pondering the next game; Clark looked nervous and Vlaar over exuberant.
Allardyce probably expected a tougher game, and was surprised to come out with a clean sheet and 3 points, I don't think Lambert will be too concerned, this was always a test and certain tactical changes will take time, perhaps with a signing or two.

A deserved 3 points for West Ham, but as a Villa fan it was great to see the team passing even if these first 5 games might be a hard watch.

We have our club back! McLeish is gone!

McLeish has gone, the droll tactics are over and the next man will get the full backing of a club desperate for football rather than trophies.
Rather than discussing his inadequacies I thought I would write about our squad rebuild, a squad that isn't as bad as uninformed journalists and inept managers report.
Next season is another of rebuild, we have had a few of them recently, but we have a good base that would allow the next manager a flexible attitude for improvement.

If I were a manager, or a chairman looking at what we have and which manager fits my ambitions this is how I would look at my current squad.
The following is the squad of 20 I would use next season (not including transfers), players in red are those younger players I would move closer to first team action.


Given
Marshall (for his coaching academy)
Siegrist

Lichaj
Dunne
Clark
Baker


Herd
Gardner
Albrighton
Delph
Ireland
Bannan
N'Zog
Caruthers
Johnson


Bent
Weimann
Delfouneso (with lots of ass kicking, reality checks and support)
Graham Burke

My ambitions would be to see whether Gardner is defensive or driving, I would bring on Johnson whenever I could but in training see who he plays the best one touch football with, he is very talented at this, then use him with those players.

N'Zogbia I would encourage to be more like a forward and try and work him with Ireland and Bent; I would make sure he realises that Albrighton is a great outlet for a chance switch of play.
Albrighton I would keep near the wing, unless he comes inside to link up play, but with the hope to take the second or third pass behind the fullback.
Ireland and Bannan are great at doing this and Albrighton loves a chance to cross so I would encourage him to always flash the ball across the box if he hasn't got time to be accurate. Early balls win games.
This I feel would make proper use of Bent and allow midfielders to make late runs into the box; the one thing that is true of Gardner is that he does like to make late runs into the box.

In defence I would go with Clarke and Dunne, Clarke should play in his natural position and has good feet for a centre back but not for a midfielder. Baker would be in the mix and I would drop/shift Dunne if the young kids built a brilliant relationship. (I would try them)

Lichaj on the right would complement a winger and not a forward but I would spend good money on a left back that would actually make things happen going forward while having the pace to get back and support his defenders.

Other big money signings might come in the form of a winger because I think Albrighton tires easily and it would be nice to have a lethal threat on the wing.
I would look at getting a young decent right back and see who was available for low fees and wages in the lower/other leagues, if economically they were sound I'd buy them anyway because young players depreciate very little, it works for Spurs.

Young players across the whole of defence, up front and on the wing would be imperative but I wouldn't turn down a chance to buy someone with real potential to sacrifice some of the older, or slower improving players.

Ability is important but mentality is key and I would look at getting players who are still battling to understand the game, their potential and their ability to work as part of a tactic. Managers can achieve this as is being demonstrated with Ben Arfa at Newcastle but they also need to know their limitations as Ferguson has shown with Ravel Morrison.

I would sell Collins, Cuellar, Heskey, Warnock (unless he signed for much lower wages), Agbonlahor, (maybe n'Zog), Makoun, Hutton and Delph/Ireland if the money was good. (Ireland can be the key to our success but also a financial imbalance)

I think with some additions the squad is good enough to stay up again, and with the right players we could play with freedom and confidence in a successful manner. We have players coming through and now we have Holman he can take their place in the reserves or be used as a hard working substitute.
Depending on the size of the transfers paid I'd expect to get 45+ points and would be happy with that.

The Villa youth team is one of strong interest and unfortunately is blessed in attack more than defence, a little like the first team.
In defence Devine and Williams show promise but need to forge that promise with games. A double loan would be a good plan unless they were ready for first team activities or the first team played like the reserve team; but just as central midfield games at a decent/competitive level are imperative to development in this position.
Caira is still without a naturalness to his position and Ward is still developing his defensive attributes. I wouldn't feel comfortable moving anyone from defence into the first team.

In midfield Nelson-Addy is explosive but has a long way to go, Stieber is plodding along and Lampkin is finding it difficult to stay fit but shows ability. Courtney Cameron shows excellent promise and is ready for some first team mixing, perhaps with Jordan Graham not far behind. Jack Grealish is someone that any future manager should show interest in, young and lightweight he is a nightmare for defenders on the back foot and has shown flashes of brilliance but needs time and support in order to be a consistent threat.

In attack Connor Taylor is not considered a player of great potential but is supported by Michael Drennan a natural goalscorer and Graham Burke who have been progressing well.

The youth team needs a first team manager who supports their passing football and who would seek to develop Kevin MacDonald's initial philosophy. Having this approach would see a less tricky progression to the first team and youth players can be introduced as complements to the tactic rather than impact substitutes worrying about their individual attributes.

Wages need to be lower and tactics smarter, so use those who have already shown promise and loyalty and not those decreasing in ability at a weekly rate.

The future is very bright and the books are looking lighter, with a smart approach to using what we have, and what me might have, players can come in a act as the backbone to a team needing propping and not overhaul.

McLeish away! Are we similar to the Browns? Can Shurmur unlock the Scots potential?

Randy Lerner has sent Alex McLeish to the US to exchange ideas/learn from Cleveland Browns coach Pat Shurmur. The exchange will see Big Eck monitor a coach with similar troubles and pressures.

The Browns have had an average to poor season, haven’t excited too much and concerns about tactics have always been in question.
Though both managers share similar sporting disappointments there is one clear difference to their style; Shurmur has the fortitude to share examples of his own failures and recognise his development potential.

Comments from Shurmur such as,

"We have to play smarter" and “We can't be our own worst enemy. That's an important thing to learn.” 

echo in the opinionated minds of Aston Villa fans; McLeish so rarely criticises his team and is yet to recognise his own mistakes with tangible actions.

The recent Man City defeat was an apt example of Aston Villa’s play this season and even post match questions to McLeish exampling his lack of attacking ambition did little to encourage the manager to recognise his errors.

“I thought the players executed the plan really well and the discipline was fantastic”.

“We were never going to go gung-ho against City because we just don’t have the players to do that.”

Dwight Yorke politely disagreed with McLeish in the post match analysis and his studio colleagues offered no disagreement to the Villa legend.

This has been a problem with McLeish, he has little faith in his own players and even less in his tactical aptitude.

But why send McLeish  to the US? Match reports suggest the managers shared similar problems and a critical article from the Bleacherreport compounds the fans opinions.

'The team was terrible, especially on offense where he was the man in charge. The play-calling—his play-calling—was confusing, boring, unimaginative, and ultimately unsuccessful. All in all he looked lost many times trying to run the team.'
(http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1001827-pat-shurmur-hot-seat-ranking-the-hcs-biggest-blunders-in-2011)

The similarities in on-field play are agonisingly close but structurally they probably end there, Shurmur had little off-season, no offensive coach and limited offensive talent whereas McLeish had a whole pre season, a selection of coaching staff, old and new, and two England International strikers, one with a tremendous league record. 

Presumably he also had scout report from his most recent Premiership adventure if he did want to add any potentials.

So what can such a fresh coach teach the wise Scot?

Shurmur has gone through fan turmoil but through honest appraisals and some experimentation he seems to have won supporters over in a way that mirrors McLeish’s much slower progression.

Shurmur is able to reflect on his own management technique, something McLeish has shown little of; on his coaching technique, play calling and staffing Shurmur is quoted as saying,

"More than anything, I think what it will do is allow me to just step back and look down on some things and some areas that I may to be able to contribute more"

McLeish on the other hand has had many years as a manager, he has at his disposal a much respected Kevin McDonald as coach and a less loved Peter Grant as assistant but is neither able to use them beneficially or take a step back to work out where he/they are not contributing enough, or contributing too much.

Shurmurs inexperience may be beneficial to the wise head of McLeish; and give him fresh perspective in changing old tactics/views and trying new ideas to improve team harmony. 

Something is awry at the club and rumours are Peter Grant is not a player favourite.

As well as coaching this is something that could apply to players; on 25 year old Colt McCoy Shurmur is supportive,

"I think he throws the ball well enough. There’s so much more that goes into playing quarterback than just pure arm strength. I think you’ve seen through the years examples of guys that No. 1 have had extremely strong arms and couldn’t succeed and guys who have been very efficient and had not very strong arms and have won a lot of games."

Like the Browns Aston Villa have their own talisman but unfortunately at 32 years old Petrov, who releases most play from midfield to attack, does not have the time to develop or the mentality to do so, and in his case it’s up to his manager to change the way he plays.

This is a problem that Shurmur faces when appointing an offensive coach; he needs to get the best for his team through McCoy and he realises his new starter needs support, games and the right tactic; most of which he has been given.

In soccer central midfield is much like the quarterback position and demands a real edge of team and enigmatic play, this season McCoy began his first Browns season as a starter (replacing Delhomme) and has found his plaudits and support. Senaca Wallace who has been a pro for 9 seasons is a steady replacement but when fit McCoy is much preferred.

Aston Villa also have their McCoy/Wallace combination in the way of Petrov/Gardner but they have only recently been a preferred partnership and Petrov is yet to be removed from the equation.

McCoy has spent the year learning his trade whereas Gardner has watched his elder youth colleagues get only odd minutes before crowd pressure forces the managers hand. 

In the case of Gardner it is difficult to see how fans didn't have an influence and they have been shown astute in their passion for him to get minutes. 'Barry for England' comes to mind.

As Aston Villa fans we will take any improvement we can get for our team whether it be a physical improvement for the players or a better ideas for team morale but what we really crave is a manager who recognises football and sport is evolving and so should he.

It seems both managers will be allowed to continue for another season and perhaps the cross in sports will develop their own managerial confidence. McLeish is now stepping to the edge of his technical box a little more which has been encouraging, and Shurmur is conscious that he may need someone to call some of his plays for him.

From my own perspective I hope McLeish looks at his own technique; he needs to fully assess the quality of his coaches, look at the type of decisions he makes/could make in game and see them as brave and not a gamble. He needs to work with his players to give them sustained chances, learn how to work with particular players to get the best of them in individual and team play and develop tactics that stifles teams instead of setting out a tactic to stifle them in the final third. 

Apart from Hutton he has done an good job in the transfer window, and even Hutton is beginning to look like he is a footballer; I firmly believe with reflection and support McLeish can do a great job for Aston Villa and like Shurmur he needs time and patience.

Aston Villa 0 - 1 Manchester City (12/02/2012)

With both managers feeling the pressure but only one in fear of backlash the score line may have been a positive for both managers; Aston Villa however failed to deliver any sort of competition for a swaggering Man City who coasted to victory to reclaim top spot in the Premiership.

Manchester City lined up with a decent team littered with players struggling for form or starts and Aston Villa lined up with Heskey on the right wing, Cuellar on the left and 10 men behind the ball, the end result was one of drab defensive football and a midfield battle Aston Villa never participated in.

From the first minute the two game plans were obvious, Aston Villa sat back lumping the ball to Heskey and Bent while Man City calmly plugged away in their defensive exercise.

Until the 88^th minute the match was barely a contest, but at least it became a game in the 76^th with the introduction of Stephen Ireland. Aston Villa were drab, predicable and defensive with no intent on pushing forward as a unit and taking a chance on matching Man City. Man City were fairly drab too but never really looked concerned by the Aston Villa tactics.

Aguero looked lively and shifted the Villa back line every time Man City moved into the final third; his shooting lacked the same class and Johnson who hit the post in the first 10minutes also followed that trend. In truth the game was about a controlled Man City backline including Kolarov and Zabaleta and smart midfield including Barry and Milner who made Petrov look inept and Gardner inexperienced. The Aston Villa midfield were not aided by awful tactics but Barry looked excellent and moved the ball to his teammates with ease in all parts of the pitch. 

When Villa did move forward Barry closed them down well and held a solid shape with De Jong.

Man City had a vast majority of the ball but it was a corner in the 62^nd minute that finally gave their away form the boost it needed. Man City always looked dangerous from corners and while Silva lacked through balls in open play his set piece delivery was stunning. Constantly under pressure Villa finally cracked from a back post inswinging corner from Milner, Barry met the ball and headed it across the box to a karate kicking Lescott who put the ball away cleanly.

Lescott in truth has a good game especially in attack where the childhood Villa fan had the Villains scrambling at every corner. For the goal he was helped by a confused Cuellar who instead of watching the ball ran across the box to where he thought it was going to land and Collins who wandered from his position to also close down the curing ball. Lescott was happy to accept his freedom in the box.

Freedom was something that Man City had on their left side; Albrighton was the pushing highline but also played as a wingback, he was left to chase many balls and was not aided in any way by a bungling Hutton who looked involved in the final third but lacking any defensive ability.

For Aston Villa the game came alive in the 88^th minute when McLeish encouraged his players to come forward but the late substitute N’Zogbia had little support from midfield and Albrighton had already been withdrawn. Late on Aston Villa had a couple of chances that did trouble Hart; especially a volley from Bent but it was too late and they had wasted their home advantage and Man City’s lack of away form.

Mancini would no doubt leave happier that his out of form players picked up a win but a post match interview McLeish showed he too was satisfied with his teams’ efforts.

Those Aston Villa efforts were directed to defence and three centre backs showed their intent; Albrighton played more like a returning defensive midfielder than a winger, Heskey who was great in defence offered no attacking ability and a dropping midfield left Keane frustrated in his last game and Bent completely isolated. Bent perhaps could have won many more headers with his back to goal but this was the Aston Villa ploy, hold the ball if possible and stifle the Man City possession. 

They did neither.

Aston Villa fans were no doubt expecting to concede a few more but like at Arsenal a few weeks ago Man City were there to be tested; unfortunately like the Villa team that came out in the second half of that clash at the Emirates they lacked managerial backing and any belief to win the game which ultimately made them look second rate.

The 100 odd Villa fans protesting McLeish may have been in the minority but after 88 minutes of uninspiring football and a self assured McLeish interview perhaps their numbers will swell.

Update - Dunne who was injured late on has a fractured clavicle and will be out for 2 months.

Manchester United 2 – 1 Liverpool (11/02/2012)

Two strong teams lined up in a game neither could afford to lose and it was Sir Alex who came out on top with his blend of youth, intelligence, experience and hard work.

In a game that started under an Evra/Suarez black fog and a lacking an ‘all clear’ handshake there was little animosity on the pitch and a sense of purpose from both teams.

Liverpool started the brightest and immediately pushed forward with Suarez and Kuyt running the channels well; unfortunately they were met by a staunch United defence and excellent tracking back from United’s attacking players who as soon as the game settled made both Liverpool strikers took fairly anonymous.

Wayne Rooney’s two goals in 3 minutes exemplified United’s killed instinct but the work of two of his teammates allowed move after move to find its way into the Liverpool half and Sky’s Man of the Match 

Rooney to play the game at his tempo.

Paul Scholes played a neat passing game that allowed a hardworking attacking outfit in front of him time and more importantly space to get onto the ball; a lesson for any central midfielder Scholes used his teammates to great effect and rarely misplaced a pass, or relied on the killer balls to get a move going. His body shape and control on the ball was only matched by Rooney who was devastating in all parts of the pitch and had Liverpool players scrambling.

The quality on show from both players only materialised because of their target man, channel running lone forward Welbeck who played magnificently and worked tirelessly to get himself all over the park, especially in the first half. In their own half Welbeck put Liverpool under huge amounts of pressure and allowed Giggs and Valencia to take their defensive duties seriously and time to get into attack.

This all amounted to a fairly average and stagnant performance from Liverpool who defended in numbers and failed to push United back until they changed to 442. Suarez looked full of purpose but he found it difficult to get any extra time on the ball and wasn’t helped by a slow passing midfield and dropping Gerrard.

Wayne Rooney who should have had a hat trick continually tested Liverpool in midfield and attack and looked comfortable with Scholes behind him and Valencia racing up in support. His first goal on 47mins typified his ability and Liverpool’s frailty, as a corner missed by everyone dropped to his right boot and allowed him to volley the ball past Reina with Johnson left stranded by Rooney's movement..

In the 50^th minute Rooney struck again as he was found by a fantastic Valencia who deftly played a ball into Rooney’s path allowing him to slide the ball in-between Reina’s legs. It typified United today who won many 50/50 balls and pressurised Liverpool in every part of the pitch.

On 80 minutes a Charlie Adam ball into the box and a mistake from Ferdinand, who was caught out by the flight of the ball, dropped to Suarez who duly tucked the ball past de Gea. Adam who came on with 15minutes to go allowed Liverpool a little more room and a better shape to force United back but ultimately the goal came out of nowhere and Liverpool did little to trouble United after that.

A well deserved victory for United that puts them top overnight and leaves Liverpool tittering on the edge of mediocrity.

Though United deserved the victory the game will be overshadowed by two tunnel incidences, a lack of handshake from Suarez (though Evra enjoyed the pantomime of it all), Ferdinand sticking up for this left back with the same gesture to Suarez, a foolish celebration and two passionate interviews from the opposing managers.

On the pitch the match was without incident and at the end of the day that was what mattered.

Yes sir, no sir, three bags full of money. Capello resigns.

   As Capello leaves his post as England manager a nations fans rejoice and the FA could be pushed into making the decision the fans would have made many years ago.
That decision is not one pertaining to the potential appointment of Harry Redknapp but rather if he does get the job fans will feel vindicated that they finally have a man with motivational charm and in this case a suitable nationality to boot.


And Booting will most likely be the next step for Mr Redknapp; a few players must be concerned for their future and others perhaps ready to give the best 6months of their career but what we know is that he has the attitude to make players believe and everybody with the right attitude could be in contention.


Capello leaves amongst Terry turmoil and the FA’s statement showed no signs of giving anything away.

"We have accepted Fabio's resignation, agreeing this is the right decision. We would like to thank Fabio for his work with the England team and wish him every success in the future."

At least they are taking control again and perhaps the next step they make will make or break them as a unit.

   Capello whose recent appearance on Italian television criticised the way The FA dealt with the Terry affair was the final insult for both parties, and the impending resignation has been nicely coupled with 6 months press of ‘Arry for England.’

If anyone needs reminding of the qualities of a man motivator they should look at O’Neil at Villa, O’Neil at Sunderland and of course Redknapp at Tottenham.

So who might prosper and who might get cut and who might sneak in if Redknapp gets the nod?



Darren Bent – Sold by Redknapp; thinks his wife is a better striker.

Jermain Defoe – Liked by Harry, plays for his club, still in and around the England squad.

Kyle Walker - Harry’s right back star gets things going for his attacking team and works well in his system.

Ashley Young – Harry tried to buy him so will probably get his place

Gabriel Agbonlahor – Another player Harry has been linked with

Aaron Lennon – Admired by Harry, plays for him and in front of Walker.

Frank Lampard – Family, blood is thicker than water

Joe Cole – Surely not....but Harry has always liked him

David Beckham – Still an admirer; sees him at Spurs so why not England

Dawson – Not a regular for England but one for Tottenham and liked by Redknapp

Phil Jagielka – Handy player that Harry would find useful at Spurs and probably useful for England

Ledley King – Looks assured of his place if he stays fit, a certain starter under Redknapp

Jack Rodwell – Harry has made no secret of his admiration, perhaps he will get some friendlies

Scott Parker – Clearly a starter for Harry and it could signal the end for either Lampard or Gerrard with a captains role to boot

So is it going to be Harry? And if so is he going back to Spurs? A nice way to get to know some players if he is.

Alex McLeish - Thoughts and analysis

   As the season has developed McLeish has looked more assured and more comfortable rotating his team, he is however struggling to gel a few of his stars into the defensive force his pedigree illustrates.

An International centre back in his footballing career the anguish is obvious when teams attack his fragile Villa defence and he can only look on in disbelief as Villa defenders stray from their position and ready up the boo boys.

Big Eck as he is known has inherited an ageing stagnant defence that has little competition and a league position that cannot be experimented with. On paper the defence should offer a lot, two hugely experienced centre backs, a highly capped Scottish right back and a left back with strong Premiership experience, but in reality there seems to be a real struggle keeping out the opposition attackers and a lack of concentration that does little to help the sprawling defensive midfield.

He has options but they are in the way of youngsters with injury problems and little Premiership experience. Lichaj (right back) has returned from a long injury, Enda Stevens (left back) has only just arrived at the club, Baker (centre back) is untested and Clark (centre back) is filling in for the injured Herd as a defensive midfielder.

Carlos Cuellar has recently come in for Collins but looks every bit as fragile as his counterpart and just as frustrating a partner for Dunne; whose agitation on the pitch is evident as he plays at least 10minutes of the game covering his wandering colleagues.

   Big Eck has little to work with at the back and making drastic changes could create a downward league spiral that could remind him of his Birmingham City relegation days. Many Villa fans have been calling for Collins to be dropped for Cuellar, which didn’t work out spectacularly, or Clark to return to his favourite position and play alongside his Irish counterpart Dunne but for now the fragility of the whole team is clearly stopping McLeish from risking his younger potentials.

This issue probably arises from the fact McLeish is a centre back; he understands the importance of a consistent tight unit and is searching for just that (trust put in Hutton perhaps), but this ability to understand a defence may be hindering him to create a balance of players who play well together in the modern game and are not simply committed to getting players behind the ball.

  This could however be symptomatic of problems elsewhere especially in central midfield where there is little or no balance. In the last few games Petrov and Clark have played admirably with Petrov managing to sustain his fitness past 60minutes but they have offered little outlet in attack and found themselves almost sitting on their defence or playing within 10 yards of them. This defensive mentality helps get men behind the ball but it also allows attacking players time to commit two opposition players and create holes in an already confused Aston Villa backline.

The success and failure of Aston Villa probably relies on the dropping of their most consistent player; Petrov who has been magnificent for a few years does little wrong, he is however as ineffective as he is consistent and although he has incredible ability to keep the ball he also facilitates a slow game that usually ends up with him playing the safe, slow ball backward. Alongside him Clark has been covering for Herd but both have defensive midfield attitudes and lack the passing ability Petrov holds.

This is where McLeish is letting the team down, he has recently brought in Gardner but has been playing this central midfielder on the wing and not taking a gamble on a predictable Petrov.

   There has been little in the way of central midfield experiments and it has been detrimental to the defenders; especially those who are already making mistakes. Central midfield is rarely available to win 50/50 clearances, they stand on their defenders pushing them back or forcing them to commit and infrequently become high line supporting players on the counter.

Unfortunately this problem has to be with management, either the tactic is wrong or they are failing to identify problems the current central midfield is having. A mix is available with Bannan, Gardner and Delph all able to play midfield but none of them really show the defensive duty that Herd showed in his brief spell; and even then his partner Petrov only played a few yards ahead of him.

This issue in midfield is certainly causing the defence extra problems and is affecting the mentality of a usually calm Dunne who has been caught out of position a lot this season; usually because he covers his straying defenders.

This central midfield problem can be highlighted in every game since Robbie Keane arrived; the intelligent player is dropping into positions that usually win him the ball but spends a lot of time dropping into the places central midfield should be. What seems baffling is how often he comes back only to see the ball fly over his head and into a 4 defenders vs Darren Bent scenario. His remonstrating arms do little to change the momentum and central midfield seems vacant and lonely for the striker as he gestures furiously at the tea party still happening in the Villa half.

   In the last three games it seems McLeish has noted this and Villa have been playing with a much higher line, players are pressing and the defence is looking a little more comfortable. Newcastle who last week were lucky to steal all 3 points would most certainly agree, and most Villa fans, though disappointed, could see marked improvements in the way their team played as a unit.

Defensive issues still remain, Hutton needs a retreating winger, Warnock needs a midfielder to reduce the space attackers have in his defensive zone and Collins/Cuellar regularly need a dropping midfielder to play alongside Dunne.

The problem is either with the players or with the tactic, but adjustments are needed and consideration is needed for players to play their natural game.

Attack on the other hand has been hugely improved since the signing of Keane, and even before then Ireland was looking more dangerous and combined well with the likes of Bent and Albrighton. Agbonlahor has looked off form but close touch football and incisive passing on the opposite wing has created team chances in the final third.

Since losing Young and Downing the wings have been a problem for Aston Villa and Agbonlahor plays his best football up top; Albrighton has played sporadically and is now suffering a niggle, Bannan has not been thrust into a forward position with Heskey preferred on the flank and in the hole.

  There seems to be little attempt to truly test defences and McLeish has often reverted to a strong man back to goal model with onrushing supporting players.; unfortunately he doesn’t play the right supporting players to get the best of this, which is why Darren Bent has been playing just outside the centre circle in Heskey’s absence to allow Ireland and Keane on the ball. This lack of tenacity and determination makes the team predictable, as Martinez will testify with Moses sometimes it is good to play a player whose first thought is to go forward and wants to make and score goals. As exampled with N’Zogbia it seems McLeish does little to encourage him to beat the man and usually has him taken off for losing the ball too often or looking out of touch with his team mates.

Aston Villa must be wondering how to get the best from their stars but using Herd and Ireland as examples probably gives us a clue as to how he should manage his ‘underperforming’ stars.

Very different players they have benefitted from belief when the chips were down and a sustained amount of football in a supportive tactic. Herd was allowed to defend and Ireland has been allowed to play a free role for more than the usual two games that McLeish allows his less known players.

Albrighton has come in and looked good but is rarely allowed to grow into games and is left isolated or retreating a fair amount of time. A good link up player and one happy to take on the opposition he is given very little in the way of one touch play and has grown into games a lot earlier since playing close to Ireland and even Keane, McLeish rarely plays to his strengths and he is expected to formulate and create attacks while covering Hutton or Warnock, depending on which wing he is switched to.

N’Zogbia suffers this problem too; though a very different player with great footwork and strong upper body strength he rarely has an overlapping player to complement his want to draw in a defender and rarely crosses early; something that must be picked up by management. N’Zogbia has looked isolated too but usually of his own making, though he has lost the ball a lot this year he still wants it and is happy to cover to make up for his mistake. Instead of finding a supporting tactic, playing him wider (or as a forward) or continuing to show belief for a sustained period of time McLeish has dropped him or taken him off early.

He has tweeted he is unhappy and it isn’t really much a surprise for this enigmatic player.

   Over this season Big Eck has made many comments about his team that spoke truth, such as berating them for not being good enough at Spurs, but McLeish has made two comments that should concern most Villa fans, “I'm disappointed we didn't hold on” while 1 – 0 up at home to an injury plagued Everton, and against Newcastle on substituting Ireland "it was clear at half-time that he didn't have the capacity to get close to people. He had an ankle problem."

Everton are a difficult unit to break down but playing is your won half is no way to beat them and on Ireland, Petrov rarely has the ability to close down a player especially in the 70th minute but has been a consistent thorn in Aston Villa advancing forward.

Ireland on the other hand has really shown real commitment and defensively has been a different player; yes it was disappointing that he didn’t close down a cross that lead to a goal but Hutton makes this mistake at least 5 times a game and is punished fairly regularly, Warnock too misses tackles and leaves Dunne hugely exposed.

Ireland made life very difficult for Newcastle’s defence and his calmness on the ball was only matched by Keane who dropped out of the game after half time leaving Aston Villa looking fairly impotent. Bannan did a good job at linking up play but he has a long way to go and needs minutes to settle his desire to impress. McLeish has dealt with Bannan’s troubles well but the question of when he will get real minutes has been circulating for a while.

   Substitutions have been an issue for many Villa fans and McLeish has been making changes to some of his policies, such as using his youngsters earlier, but he still remains steadfast in his last 10minute sub tactic usually wasted with the likes of Heskey and not Weimann.

Recently we have seen McLeish happy to remove a lacklustre Agbonlahor and try some youngsters but much of this feels like crowd pressure and not shrewd decisions, a little like the eventual dropping of Heskey. Gardner has energy and determination to burn and is finally getting some sort of chance, even if on the right wing, Delph was smartly dropped and sent out on loan to regain his confidence but players such as the hard working Weimann were overlooked by an infrequently used Delfouneso, who has looked assuredly arrogant of his abilities even at Leicester. Burke and Williams have made the bench but it is baffling that a very assured looking and in-form Daniel Johnson continues to gain his experience watching more establish youngsters warm the bench and not with playing a few minutes here and there.

   McLeish and Grant clearly work well together and McLeish has been getting off the bench a little more instead of simply using Grant as his collaborator; but he needs to take more control. The board seem happy with the appointment and in truth Villa haven’t been any worse than under Houllier but as the season starts to conclude it has to be a concern to most Villa fans that new players will come in, the gelling period will continue and a season to test the younger stars will have vanished.

The answer is not easy but a radical approach to the way players get their chance needs to be established, younger players and those considered out of form need a real chance, tactics need to play to players strengths and the last 30 minutes of games should not be used to close out games, or improve how the tactic works they should change the tenacity of attack when down, or the way players are released from midfield when his team is in the lead. Gambles are needed, especially when so many of the squad have played together at youth and reserve level. Herd, Albrighton, Clark, Gardner, Johnson, Bannan, Weimann, Lichaj, Baker and Delfouneso all know each other’s games but they rarely get a match to test their abilities, or 20minutes to chase a game.

   Aston Villa have showed quality in spurts; McLeish has helped some players develop and does deserve a proper transfer window to replace the less cohesive players but many recent seasons have been wasted, attendances are down and hopefully McLeish realises these next 6 months he can continue developing own his management technique as well as the experience of the next generation of Villa stars.